Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24510.1291483199@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Those are difficulties, certainly. Are they insurmountable obstacles, > though? This is something that has been on the TODO list for ages and I > think is very worth doing, if we can. They're possibly surmountable with enough effort, though I think in reality what you'd end up with is annoying corner-case behaviors (eg, deadlock failures in some cases). Anyway Greg and I seem to agree on the bottom line: such a feature is not actually interesting for partitioned tables, as it destroys most of the benefits of partitioning. I have a feeling that the feature will languish on the TODO list forever, unless someone comes up with a brilliant idea to avoid the problems. As is, the return on investment to do it just isn't there. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: