Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24480.1396378565@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> writes: > On 1.4.2014 19:08, Tom Lane wrote: >> Actually, though, the patch as given outright breaks things for both >> the grouped and ungrouped cases, because the aggregate no longer >> releases memory when it's done. That's going to result in memory >> bloat not savings, in any situation where the aggregate is executed >> repeatedly. > Looking at array_agg_finalfn (which is the final function for > array_agg), I see it does this: > /* > * Make the result. We cannot release the ArrayBuildState because > * sometimes aggregate final functions are re-executed. Rather, it > * is nodeAgg.c's responsibility to reset the aggcontext when it's > * safe to do so. > */ > result = makeMdArrayResult(state, 1, dims, lbs, > CurrentMemoryContext, > false); > i.e. it sets release=false. So I fail to see how the current code > behaves differently from the patch? You're conveniently ignoring the callers that set release=true. Reverse engineering a query that exhibits memory bloat is left as an exercise for the reader (but in a quick look, I'll bet ARRAY_SUBLINK subplans are one locus for problems). It's possible that it'd work to use a subcontext only if release=true; I've not dug through the code enough to convince myself of that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: