Re: Open 7.3 issues
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open 7.3 issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24445.1029691157@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open 7.3 issues ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes: > Daft question but isn't this an administrator's issue? The feature wasn't going to change; the argument was just about whether to change the factory-default permissions mask for the socket. An admin could override the default in any case (and probably should, in many cases). The argument for 0700 was that it is "secure", the argument against was that it's useless. No one sane runs their apps as the postgres user, therefore you'd always be having to open it up anyway. We thought a little about 0770 but the problem is that the actual behavior is extremely context-dependent. On some Unixes this is just what you want, on others it's little different from 0777. In any case depending on group membership to control database access means that the DBA *must* have root privileges, which is not an assumption we like to make. So unless someone comes up with a new idea, we're sticking with 0777 for backwards-compatibility reasons. But certainly socket permissions ought to be on the short list of things to think about during every database install. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: