Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24433.1569621788@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 2:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I think I just forgot about this thread. Shall we change it in HEAD >> and see what happens? Maybe backpatch, but not till after 12.0 is out. > Please do. After looking closer at the code in pg_regress.c, I'm wondering a bit about PGSERVICE. A setting for that might certainly bring in a value for the database name, but I don't think we can just summarily unset it. I don't plan to do anything about that right now, but conceivably it'd bite people someday. Another thing that looks a bit fishy here is that the set of variables that pg_regress.c unsets is very much smaller than the set that libpq reacts to --- we have added a ton of the latter without touching this list (much less the three or four other places that duplicate it). I wonder how problematic that is. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: