Re: CommitFest status/management
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest status/management |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 244.1259678548@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest status/management (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest status/management
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > If we went with Bruce's interpretation, we could have a "committer" > field that only appears when the status is "Claimed by Committer" or > "Committed" and the contents of that field could be displayed in > parentheses in the status column, like this: Claimed by Committer (Tom > Lane). > If we went with Andrew's interpretation, we would need a completely > separate column, because there wouldn't be any logical relationship > between the status field and the committer field. > Any other votes? Tom? I'm happy with Andrew's interpretation --- I just want a separate text field for inserting a committer's name. I don't want any magic behavior of that field. > On a possibly related note, I am not totally sure that we want to > enshrine the principle that committers categorically won't touch > patches that are not yet marked Ready for Committer. No, but I think that should be the default assumption once a reviewer has been assigned. If the reviewer doesn't totally fall down on the job, he/she should be allowed to finish reviewing. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: