Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24361.1153115920@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Re: url for TODO item, is it right? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: >> i found this on the Monitoring section: >> o Allow protocol-level BIND parameter values to be logged >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00165.php >> >> But i don't understand why that thread is related to the TODO item, >> i'm missing something? > Possibly the message renumbering that Tom griped about: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-07/msg00061.php Yeah. I think the TODO item is intended to point to what is now http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00163.php or one of the earlier messages in that thread. Perhaps when Bruce realizes he needs to recheck every link in the TODO files, he'll get on the warpath with me ;-) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: