Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: roundoff problem in time datatype |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24340.1127744911@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: roundoff problem in time datatype (Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Re: roundoff problem in time datatype |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org> writes: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote: >> No, I think the usual notation for a leap-second is '23:59:60'. >> We do allow 60 in the seconds field for this purpose. > Yes, and it can go up to 23:59:60.999999 (depending on how many fractional > seconds one want). That's an urban legend. There never have been, and never will be, two leap seconds instituted in the same minute. We really should reject anything larger than '23:59:60'. > One "solution" is to round '23:59:59.9'::time(0) up to '00:00:00'. 7.2 did that, and we concluded it was broken. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: