Re: small but useful patches for text search
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: small but useful patches for text search |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24328.1237236089@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: small but useful patches for text search (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: small but useful patches for text search
Re: small but useful patches for text search Re: small but useful patches for text search Re: small but useful patches for text search |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I think it's clear that stretching feature freezes is a failed policy. Yeah, it's the same old same old --- once again, we've bent over backwards to try to accommodate large patches at the end of a development cycle. I'm not sure that that's ever going to stop, because every time there are people cheerleading for said patches and insisting that the release will be so much better if we wait for them. Somehow we keep expecting that they'll get fixed and landed in a short period of time. A saner policy would mandate that large patches land near the start of a development cycle, but I don't know how we get people to do that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: