Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24309.957464165@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > It occurred to me that this would be the likely symptom if a CREATE > GROUP or ALTER GROUP command had neglected to update the indexes on > pg_group. However, I can't spot any such problem in the code nor > cause it to happen by hand. Anyone else have an idea? After further looking, I notice that users.c is one of the few places that will drop AccessExclusiveLock at heap_close time rather than holding it till xact commit. I wonder whether this is a bug... it could allow another backend to get in and start vacuuming the file before our updates have committed. I am not sure that vacuum would do the wrong thing in that case, but maybe so. Comments anyone (Vadim?) I also notice that there definitely is a glaring bug there: write_password_file() leaks one kernel file descriptor each time it runs (note the creat() call). Alter enough pg_shadow entries in one session and your backend stops working. I think this is a "must fix" problem --- any objections? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: