Re: Trigger question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Trigger question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24300.1074614549@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Trigger question (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes: > On Tuesday 20 January 2004 00:01, Neil Conway wrote: >> Yeah, I didn't get around to implementing that. If anyone wants this >> feature, I'd encourage them to step up to the plate -- I'm not sure >> when I'll get the opportunity/motivation to implement this myself. > I didn't think they'd be meaningful for a statement-level trigger. Surely > OLD/NEW are by definition row-level details. According to the complainants, OLD/NEW are commonly available as recordsets (tables) inside a statement trigger. I'm not very clear on how that works myself --- in particular, one would think it important to be able to work with corresponding pairs of OLD and NEW rows, which would be painful with a table-like abstraction. Can anyone explain exactly how it's done in, say, Oracle? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: