Re: [GENERAL] 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Jeff Amiel's message of mar jun 08 09:26:25 -0400 2010:
>> Jun  7 15:05:01 db-1 postgres[9334]: [ID 748848 local0.crit] [3989781-1] 2010-06-07 15:05:01.087 CDT    9334PANIC:
rightsibling 169 of block 168 is not next child of 249 in index "sl_seqlog_idx" 

> I've seen this problem (and others) in a high-load environment.  Not
> Slony related though.

> I wrote a small tool to check btree index files for consistency problems
> such as this one, by parsing pg_filedump output.  I've seen strange
> things such as index pointers pointing to pages that shouldn't have been
> pointed to; mismatching sibling pointers; and others.

I spent some more time today looking for possible causes of this (within
our code that is; the obvious elephant in the room is the possibility of
the disk storage system losing an update).  I didn't find anything, but
it did occur to me that there is a simple way to ameliorate this
problem: we could rearrange the code in _bt_pagedel() so it checks for
this case before entering its critical section.  Then, corruption of
this kind is at least only an ERROR not a PANIC.

Any objections to doing that?

            regards, tom lane