Re: Typo patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Typo patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24243.1432141520@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Typo patch (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Typo patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: > Thanks, committed. Except for this one: > - * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be seeked. > + * *Only* a frozen-for-read tape can be sought. > It's true that the past tense of "seek" is "sought", but it feels a bit > weird to me in this context. This is a comment on a function called > "<blah blah>seek", and it's not clear to me that it should conjugate > like the normal "seek" verb. I agree that "sought" is not the word to use here, but the existing wording isn't very good English either. Perhaps "Seeking is only allowed on frozen-for-read tapes"? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: