Re: Point in Time Recovery
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24226.1091207086@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Point in Time Recovery ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Point in Time Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes: > If you use a readable file you will also need a feature for restore > (or a tool) to create an appropriate pg_control file, or are you > intending to still require that pg_control be the first file backed > up. No, the entire point of this exercise is to get rid of that assumption. You do need *a* copy of pg_control, but the only reason you'd need to back it up first rather than later is so that its checkpoint pointer points to the last checkpoint before the dump starts. Which is the information we want to put in the archive-label file insted. If a copy of pg_control were sufficient then I'd be all for using it as the archive-label file, but it's *not* sufficient because you also need the ending WAL offset. So we need a different file layout in any case, and we may as well take some pity on the poor DBA and make the file easily human-readable. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: