Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 241837.1620494027@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 05.05.21 00:15, Andres Freund wrote: >> I'm now getting >> /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c: In function ‘LWLockAcquire’: >> /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c:1322:58: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body] >> 1322 | TRACE_POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_WAIT_START(T_NAME(lock), mode); >> | ^ > What compiler are you using in this situation? All of these buildfarm members are now showing this warning: calliphoridae gcc (Debian 10.1.0-6) 10.1.0 culicidae gcc (Debian 10.1.0-6) 10.1.0 flaviventris gcc (Debian 20200124-1) 10.0.1 20200124 (experimental) francolin gcc (Debian 10.1.0-6) 10.1.0 piculetœ gcc (Debian 10.1.0-6) 10.1.0 rorqual gcc (Debian 10.1.0-6) 10.1.0 serinus gcc (Debian 20200124-1) 10.0.1 20200124 (experimental) skink gcc (Debian 10.1.0-6) 10.1.0 so there's your answer. (I wonder why flaviventris and serinus are still using an "experimental" compiler version that is now behind mainstream.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: