[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24148b5f-23c0-f202-ba27-28526fbccd4b@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/09/2017 02:52 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 06/09/2017 06:16 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 06/08/2017 11:09 PM, Noah Misch wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: >>>> On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote: >>>> > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions) >>>> > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of RLS/partition >>>> > constraint checking. It should be much more straight-forward now, but >>>> > let me know if there are any further recommended changes. >>>> >>>> Thanks, will take a look towards the end of the day. >>> >>> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send >>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status >>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: >>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com >> >> I started reviewing the latest patch last night and will try to finish >> up this afternoon (west coast USA time). > > I left the actual (2 line) code change untouched, but I tweaked the > regression test changes a bit. If there are no complaints I will push > tomorrow (Saturday). I waited until Sunday, but pushed none-the-less. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: