Re: mapping object names to role IDs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: mapping object names to role IDs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24134.1274894822@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: mapping object names to role IDs (alvherre <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: mapping object names to role IDs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
alvherre <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié may 26 07:20:30 -0400 2010: >> I still feel that we'd be better off putting all the functions that >> use the same design pattern in a single file, rather than spreading >> them out all over the backend. > This doesn't buy you anything, because that one header will likely have > to #include all the other headers anyway. And if this is so, then all > those headers will now be included in all files that require even a > single one of these functions. For the particular case Robert is proposing, the *header* isn't a problem, because the only types it would deal in are Oid, bool, const char *, and List *. But you're right that in general this design pattern carries a risk of having to include the world in a commonly-used header file, which is certainly not a good idea. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: