Re: BUG #17056: Segmentation fault on altering the type of the foreign table column with a default

On 6/11/21 5:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> How to ignore something that's got into the catalog that shouldn't be
> there is less clear. At the point where we fetch missing values all we
> have access to is a TupleDesc.
>
>

On further reflection I guess we'll need to make that check at the point
where we fill in the TupleDesc.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com