Re: Thousands of parallel connections
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Thousands of parallel connections |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24083.1092702728@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Thousands of parallel connections (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Thousands of parallel connections
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Chris Travers <chris@metatrontech.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> That does not add up: the graph can't have a negative y-intercept. >> There should be a substantial cost to run the postmaster at all, >> and then an essentially fixed cost per connection --- assuming >> that all the connections are running similar queries, of course. >> You're telling us the first 40 connections require zero RAM. > That is strange. Is it really linear or does the cost go up somewhat > after the first few? Well, if you have significant contention problems then the speed could be worse than linear --- but he was talking about memory usage. AFAICS, a backend doing a particular query should need X amount of RAM pretty much independently of how many others there are. The only data structure I can think of that would be impacted at all is QuerySnapshot, and at 4 bytes per sibling backend it's *way* down in the noise... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: