Re: BUG #16840: Rows not found in table partitioned by hash when not all partitions exists
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16840: Rows not found in table partitioned by hash when not all partitions exists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2407555.1611770914@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16840: Rows not found in table partitioned by hash when not all partitions exists (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16840: Rows not found in table partitioned by hash when not all partitions exists
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > CREATE TABLE dir ( > id SERIAL, > volume_id BIGINT, > path TEXT > ) PARTITION BY HASH (volume_id); > CREATE TABLE dir_part_2 PARTITION OF dir FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, > remainder 2); > SELECT * FROM dir WHERE volume_id=1 AND (path='abc' OR path='def') -- > returns 0 rows - NOT OK! Hmm, seems to be a case of faulty partition exclusion, because the plan isn't scanning anything: =# explain SELECT * FROM dir WHERE volume_id=1 AND (path='abc' OR path='def'); QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------ Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) One-Time Filter: false (2 rows) Probably the reason we'd not noticed is that an incomplete set of hash partitions isn't a very useful situation: if you don't populate all of the partitions, you risk unexpected insertion failures, since you really shouldn't be assuming which partition any given key value will map into. Still, it's clearly a bug. Thanks for the report! regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: