Re: BUG #16797: EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM timestamp) is not using local timezone
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16797: EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM timestamp) is not using local timezone |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2405485.1609363754@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16797: EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM timestamp) is not using local timezone (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16797: EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM timestamp) is not using local timezone
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dana Burd <djburd@gmail.com> writes: > Wondering then, when local timezone is set to anything other than UTC, why > does: > '01/01/1970 00:00:00'::timestamp = > '01/01/1970 00:00:00'::timestamptz > To compare these datetime values, postgres is making an implicit cast of > some kind - and if they are equal then their epoch values should be equal > as well. For comparison purposes, the timestamp value is taken as being in your local zone (the one specified by the timezone GUC). The timestamptz value is just an absolute UTC instant. The above example is a bit confusing since '01/01/1970 00:00:00'::timestamptz is *also* read as being in your local zone --- but that happens when the literal constant is parsed, rather than during execution of the comparison. Presuming EST5EDT zone, '01/01/1970 00:00:00'::timestamptz really means '1970-01-01 00:00:00-05'::timestamptz which is equivalent to '1970-01-01 05:00:00+00'::timestamptz, and then we have to convert the timezone at runtime to do a meaningful comparison. I'd thought this was adequately documented already, but perhaps not. There are a couple of passing references to timestamp<->timestamptz conversions in section 8.5, but really section 9.9 ought to cover datetime comparison behavior, and it doesn't say anything about this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: