Re: Safer auto-initdb for RPM init script
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Safer auto-initdb for RPM init script |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24027.1156515647@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Safer auto-initdb for RPM init script ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM initscript
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM init Re: Safer auto-initdb for RPM init script |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: >> I don't really want to remove the auto-initdb feature from the >> script, because it's important not to drive away newbies by making >> Postgres hard to start for the first time. But I think we'd better >> think about ways to make it more bulletproof. > Why does initdb have to happen on startup? Wouldn't it be much more > logical to do it at install time? It eats rather a lot of disk space for a package that might just be getting loaded as part of a system install, with no likelihood of actually being used. In CVS tip a just-initdb'd data directory seems to be a shade under 30MB, which I guess isn't a huge amount these days but it compares unfavorably with the installed footprint of the code itself (postgresql-server RPM looks to be about 4MB). If this were a bulletproof solution then I'd consider it anyway, but AFAICS it's got the very same vulnerabilities as the flag-file method, ie, if you RPM install or upgrade while your mountable data directory is offline, you can still get screwed. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: