Re: 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24014.1215189468@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> writes: > I've just noticed that the planner in 8.3.3 doesn't seem to realize the > difference in the result of the following: > GROUP BY col; > GROUP BY col IS NULL; Yeah, estimate_num_groups doesn't have any special knowledge about IS NULL -- it just sees this as "an expression involving col". The general assumption about that is that the expression doesn't reduce the number of groups (think "col + 1" for example). In general I'd rather it overestimated the number of groups than underestimated, so I don't think this heuristic is really wrong. Putting in a special case for IS NULL seems a bit silly, but maybe checking for a boolean result type would cover enough real-world uses to be worth the trouble? Not sure. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: