pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24009.933459480@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I re-enabled pg_upgrade this afternoon, thinking that it would be easier to use than dump/initdb/reload for coping with the pg_statistic change I'm about to commit. However, testing shows that it doesn't really work. The "upgraded" database behaves very strangely --- vacuum tends to fail, and I have seen duplicate listings for attributes of a relation in psql's \d listing, broken links between a relation and its indices, and other problems. I think the problem is that pg_upgrade no longer works in the presence of MVCC. In particular, forcibly moving the old database's pg_log into the new is probably a bad idea when there is no similarity between the sets of committed transaction numbers. I suspect the reason for the strange behaviors I've seen is that after the pg_log copy, the system no longer believes that all of the rows in the new database's system tables have been committed. Is it possible to make pg_upgrade work again, perhaps by requiring a vacuum on the old and/or new databases just before the move happens? Or must we consign pg_upgrade to the dustbin of history? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: