Re: Fast vector similarity metric
От | otisg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fast vector similarity metric |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23be01c1c951$b1f9da00$6ac8010a@mail2world.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fast vector similarity metric (Travis Bauer <trbauer@indiana.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Java, search engine....why not use something like Lucene?
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene
Otis
_______________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE email account at iVillage.com!
http://webmail.ivillage.com/
<-----Original Message----->
>
> From: Travis Bauer
> Sent: 3/11/2002 8:13:23 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Fast vector similarity metric
>
> I am writing a java search engine which uses Postgresql as the backend.
> In this search engine, I'm using an inverted term table (to store the
> vectors). The search engine is actually working, but the vector
> comparison is very slow. I'm wondering if someone with experience with
> this sort of thing could give me some ideas on how to implement a fast
> vector comparison for Postgres.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene
Otis
_______________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE email account at iVillage.com!
http://webmail.ivillage.com/
<-----Original Message----->
>
> From: Travis Bauer
> Sent: 3/11/2002 8:13:23 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Fast vector similarity metric
>
> I am writing a java search engine which uses Postgresql as the backend.
> In this search engine, I'm using an inverted term table (to store the
> vectors). The search engine is actually working, but the vector
> comparison is very slow. I'm wondering if someone with experience with
> this sort of thing could give me some ideas on how to implement a fast
> vector comparison for Postgres.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: