Re: amcheck assert failure
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: amcheck assert failure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23979.1555962717@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: amcheck assert failure (Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: amcheck assert failure
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru> writes: > On 04/22/2019 09:05 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> The ascii string "blablahblah" has been overwritten at byte offset >> 1040 (from the beginning of the page). I would take a closer look at >> what those tests do. Either the problem is in the tests, or your >> database is haunted, which is outside my area of expertise. > It`s data corruption test, but I`ve forgot to turn checksums on. > I`m sorry for wasting your time. Nonetheless ... do we really want an assertion failure rather than some more-mundane error report? Seems like the point of amcheck is to detect data corruption, so I'd rather get an ERROR than an assertion (which would not fire in production builds anyway). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: