Re: feature proposal ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: feature proposal ...
Дата
Msg-id 23972.1127358578@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: feature proposal ...  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: feature proposal ...  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
>> Writing a file on the server requires significant privilege, including
>> access to the server itself so you can retrieve the results.

> But we also do COPY to STDOUT which requires no special privileges on 
> the server.

Currently, we have a special privilege type about creating temporary
tables, which I think also restricts creating temporary views --- but
now that I think about it, it's not obvious why that should follow.
The only good argument I can see for restricting temp table creation
is that one might eat up large amounts of server disk space with a temp
table, and of course this argument doesn't apply to a temp view.  So we
could refute this argument by just not making the permission check for
CREATE TEMP VIEW.

> Incidentally, if we are going to allow copy out from views, it would be 
> nice and orthogonal to allow copy in too. Hasn't there been some talk 
> about making automatically writeable views?

Sure, but until we actually have automatically writable views, it's a
bit premature to worry about that.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: 2 forks for md5?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2 forks for md5?