Re: pgbench post-connection command
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench post-connection command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23944.1326389535@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench post-connection command (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench post-connection command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I don't believe that works for multiple \set commands, which is the >> more likely use-case for this; as noted upthread, executing SET here >> is quite unnecessary since you can get that behavior with >> "export PGOPTIONS". > OK, so you want... > \setonce <command> More like "\once ... any SQL command or meta command here ..." if we want to extend the scripting language. But I'd be perfectly happy with a command-line switch that specifies a script file to be run once. A difficulty with \once is that it's not very clear what should happen in the case of multiple scripts (multiple -f switches). Should we go through all of them at startup looking for \once switches? Or should it happen the first time a given script is selected for execution? And do conflicting \once \sets in different scripts affect each other? If we go with a command-line switch then the confusion goes away, as it is then clear that the start script's settings should be inherited by all the client tasks. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: