Re: BUG #3320: Error when using INSERT...RETURNING as a subquery
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #3320: Error when using INSERT...RETURNING as a subquery |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23856.1180492894@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #3320: Error when using INSERT...RETURNING as a subquery (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #3320: Error when using INSERT...RETURNING as a
subquery
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 18:10 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> It has the same problem that SELECT triggers have. How many rows should you
>> expect that subquery to insert, update, or delete if it's used in a join
>> clause? Or in the where clause of another insert/update/delete statement?
> We could handle it essentially like a volatile set-returning function.
Uh-huh. Please provide a concise, accurate definition of what that
does. For extra points, be sure it describes the behavior of all recent
Postgres versions. (And after that, we could argue about whether we
actually *like* the described behavior ... which I'll bet we won't.)
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: