Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23814.1458154073@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: >> So, even though we don't need to define multiple hook declarations, >> I think the hook invocation is needed just after create_xxxx_paths() >> for each. It will need to inform extension the context of hook >> invocation, the argument list will take UpperRelationKind. > That actually seems like a pretty good point. Otherwise you can't > push anything from the upper rels down unless you are prepared to > handle all of it. I'm not exactly convinced of the use-case for that. What external thing is likely to handle window functions but not aggregation, for example? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: