Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23795.1191279220@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > We should not allow VACUUM to be concurrent with either CREATE INDEX or > ANALYZE, but then thats not the problem here anyway. I can't believe anyone is short-sighted enough to think that. The problem here is that autovac takes locks that block foreground sessions that want exclusive locks. We've always known this and always ignored it, but if autovac is on by default then it's going to be in people's faces a lot more than it was before, and they won't be happy. If you insist on crafting a solution that only fixes this problem for pg_restore's narrow usage, you'll be back revisiting it before beta1 has been out a month. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: