Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23761.994870319@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU? (Christian Bucanac <christian.bucanac@mindark.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?
Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Christian Bucanac <christian.bucanac@mindark.com> writes: >> I am going to try 768M (98304) for buffers and 6144 (6144 * 32 = 192M) >> for sort mem. This way with the DB server serving a max of 32 application >> servers the kernel and other processes should still have the last 64Mb RAM. This is almost certainly a lousy idea. You do *not* want to chew up all available memory for PG shared buffers; you should leave a good deal of space for kernel-level disk buffers. Other fallacies in the above: (1) you're assuming the SortMem parameter applies once per backend, which is not the case (it's once per sort or hash step in a query, which could be many times per backend); (2) you're not allowing *anything* for any space usage other than shared disk buffers and sort memory. The rule of thumb I recommend is to use (at most) a quarter of real RAM for shared disk buffers. I don't have hard measurements to back that up, but I think it's a lot more reasonable as a starting point than three-quarters of RAM. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: