Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2374.1251233168@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> That's within my definition of "ugly", yes :-) My ideal tool would >> do something like >> >> $ pg_ping -h foo -p 5555 >> IN_RECOVERY >> $ echo $? >> 2 >> >> $ # sleep a bit ... >> >> $ pg_ping -h foo -p 5555 >> READY >> $ echo $? >> 0 > Cool, but how would you do that without bypassing authentication? The postmaster is already set up so that if it's not accepting connections, it'll tell you so before getting to the authentication stage. If anyone were to go to the trouble of inventing pg_ping, I'd be a bit inclined to add something to the postmaster protocol so that a ping packet didn't have to look just like a phony login attempt. But that's just so that people who log connection attempts won't get all flustered. The capability exists anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: