Re: Thousands of semops for every i/o
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Thousands of semops for every i/o |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 237.1055225310@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Thousands of semops for every i/o ("Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Thousands of semops for every i/o
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org> writes: > This is the strace of a process which is deleting rows from four tables, > inside a transaction, one row at a time. There are a lot of semops for > every i/o. There are about 30 connections to this database currently. > I thought deletes in a transaction just flew along in Pg, because they > simply wrote the deleted transaction ID on the record. It used to work > fine in my previous locally-built 7.2 on Debian, but this is 7.2.2 on > SuSE Enterprise Server 8.2. The first thing that comes to mind is that the thing is using SysV semaphores as a substitute for spinlocks. If this is on a hardware platform that is supposed to have TAS() support in s_lock.h or s_lock.c, then it's a configuration or build error. If it's on some heretofore unknown platform, you need to write some TAS() code to get decent performance. One way to check is to see how many semaphores Postgres has created ("ipcs -s -a" should help here). If it's more than approx. one per max_connection then you're using semas for spinlocks. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: