Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23689.987519683@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: No printable 7.1 docs? (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: No printable 7.1 docs?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > 3) Page breaks are not always ideal. Some hand adjustments are desirable > to get a better flow to the docs, especially wrt examples and lists; you > don't want them breaking between pages if you can avoid it, especially > with short examples. This objection, at least, could be eliminated if the standard hardcopy path were through TeX (which I assume is what jadetex does). TeX understands just fine about discouraging or completely preventing page breaks within certain groups of lines. In general, TeX is a lot better suited for book-quality typesetting than any other open-source tool I've heard of. It seems to me that all of the other problems you enumerate are simply bugs in the doc toolchain. We've worked around them rather than tried to fix them because that was the shortest path to a result, but if Chris wants to tackle actually fixing them, that would sure be nice. Based on your comments here, my recommendation would be to forget RTF entirely; instead, work on getting out the kinks in the TeX pathway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: