Re: Add for ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23667.1574695019@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: Add |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes: > Em sex., 15 de nov. de 2019 às 16:10, Jeff Janes > <jeff.janes@gmail.com> escreveu: >> If you alter one of the built-in text search configurations, the modifications to it will not get dumped by pg_dump, andthus won't get propagated by pg_upgrade leading to silent behavior changes in the new cluster (as well in any other typeof restoration from pg_dump output) This isn't really different from what happens if you alter any object defined by initdb. (There are limited exceptions now for GRANT/REVOKE, but not for any other object property.) > It was a bad design to allow changes in builtin text search objects. I disagree. It is reasonable to point out that if you do that, propagating your changes to new databases is your problem. But the fact that you can mess with built-in objects has always been seen as a feature not a bug, and I'm not willing to change that approach, nor to start plastering random man pages with bright yellow cautions against doing so. Having the code itself issue complaints is right out. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: