Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23662.1086183492@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > I think we need a proper 'effective user' facility. > At the moment, there's breakage if a super user creates a language, then > drops their superuser privs, then the dump cannot be restored. The problem here is not with pg_dump; the problem is that dropping privileges doesn't cascade to dropping objects that are dependent on those privileges. AFAICS the SQL spec requires us to be able to do the latter. If we're gonna invest work on fixing this, we ought to do what the spec tells us to, not invent warts on the security model. Tossing in expedient concepts like "effective user" is a great recipe for creating unfixable security holes. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: