Re: Postgres perl module namespace
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2364418.1650305263@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres perl module namespace (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres perl module namespace
Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > No, I think we could probably just port the whole of src/test/PostreSQL > back if required, and have it live alongside the old modules. Each TAP > test is a separate miracle - see comments elsewhere about port > assignment in parallel TAP tests. > But that would mean we have some tests in the old flavor and some in the > new flavor in the back branches, which might get confusing. That works for back-patching entire new test scripts, but not for adding some cases to an existing script, which I think is more common. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: