Re: no test programs in contrib
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: no test programs in contrib |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23637.1416843983@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | no test programs in contrib (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: no test programs in contrib
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > We currently have a number of subdirectories for test-only programs: > test_parser (a toy text search parser, added in 2007) > dummy_seclabel (for SECURITY LABEL regression testing, added Sept 2010) > worker_spi (for bgworkers, added Dec 2012) > test_shm_mq (test program for shared memory queues, added Jan 2014) > test_decoding (test program for logical decoding, added March 2014) > What would you say if we were to move them to src/test/? I could also > see putting them in a brand new top-level directory, say testing/ or > testprg/. I think that test_parser is arguably useful as a skeleton/example for user-written TS parsers, so I'd lean towards leaving it where it is, but the others could move to src/test/ IMO. > Now, I know there is some resistance to the idea of moving source code > around. Usually that's when there is (a) a lot of history and (b) concern about back-patching fixes. Neither of those arguments seem real strong for these modules, with the possible exception of test_parser. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: