Re: pgdump
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgdump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23582.1105942776@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgdump (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgdump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > So the behavior would be that suggested earlier by David Skoll: >> pg_dump -t t1 -- Dump table t1 in any schema >> pg_dump -n s1 -- Dump all of schema s1 >> pg_dump -t t1 -n s1 -- Dump t1 in s1 >> pg_dump -t t1 -t t2 -n s1 -- Dump s1.t1 and s1.t2 >> pg_dump -t t1 -t t2 -n s1 -n s2 -- Dump s1.t1, s1.t2, s2.t1 and s2.t2 Well, that at least obeys the KISS principle ;-). Sure, let's try that and see if it satisfies people. Just to be clear: what I understand the logic to be is "OR" across multiple switches of the same type, but "AND" across switches of two types. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: