Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23571.1041642483@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > But it is a "sect1" in libpq. It should be a "sect1" somewhere that > makes more sense. > ... > It doesn't belong in libpq, and it doesn't belong in the Programmer's > Guide. How could it not belong in libpq? But you are right that the Programmer's Guide seems the wrong place for information that is important to end-users. Perhaps libpq needs to have a chapter in the User's Guide as well as a chapter in the Programmer's Guide? Or maybe we could put the relevant information into a reference page under PostgreSQL Client Applications (titled something along the line of "common behavior of all libpq-based client applications"). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: