Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23567.1263482210@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV ("Justin Pitts" <justinpitts@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Justin Pitts <jpitts@bplglobal.net> writes: > My guess is that I am not provoking a 'SI queue overrun' The 100 temp table creations probably will do that just fine. > Am I completely off base about how this should be reproducing? Two points: the session you hope to have crash *must* be in serializable mode, and the crash would actually happen in the transaction after the one that's rolled back. The error doesn't have to be a serialization error, so in principle you should be able to make it fail with something as simple as begin; select 1/0; rollback; select * from foo; as long as the ROLLBACK is done with a prepared statement and you've forced a SI overrun since the ROLLBACK was prepared. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: