Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23547.1562290134@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I was about to push into REL_12_STABLE, when I realized that maybe we > need to do something about the catversion first. REL_12_STABLE is still > on 201906161, while master got to 201907041 thanks to commit > 7b925e12703. Simply cherry-picking the commits would get us to > 201907052 in both branches, but that'd be wrong as the catalogs do > differ. I suppose this is what you meant by "catversion differences to > cope with". Yeah, exactly. My recommendation is to use 201907051 on v12 and 201907052 on master (or whatever is $today for you). They need to be different now that the branches' catalog histories have diverged, and it seems to me that the back branch should be "older". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: