Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23534.1472212411@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice() (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()
Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice() |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I don't have strong feelings about this. Technically, this issue > affects 9.5 also, because pqmq.c was introduced in that release. I > don't think we want to add another error field in a released branch. > However, since there's no parallel query in 9.5, only people who are > accessing that functionality via extension code would be affected, > which might be nobody and certainly isn't a lot of people, so we could > just leave this unfixed in 9.5. After sleeping on it, I think the right answer is to introduce the new error-message field (and not worry about 9.5). Will work on a patch for that, unless I hear objections pretty soon. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: