Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 235162.1633709563@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes? (Mikael Kjellström <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu> writes: > Yes, it's getting long in the tooth. I will upgrade the NetBSD 7 > (sidewinder) to 9.2. > And I will also upgrade loach to 12.x if that's the version that is > needed the most. > I will upgrade conchuela to DragonFlyBSD 6.0. > I will remove the 5.9 (curculio) and upgrade the 6.5 (morepork) to 6.9. +1 to all of that except retiring curculio. That one has shown us issues we've not seen on other animals (recent examples at [1][2]), so unless you're feeling resource-constrained I'd vote for keeping it going. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YPAdf9r5aJbDoHoq@paquier.xyz [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1+uW1UGDHDz-HWMHMen76mKP7NJebOTZN4uwbyMjaYVww@mail.gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: