Re: Command Triggers
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command Triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23507.1323016484@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command Triggers (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command Triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > I have two questions now: > First, does anybody think it would be worth getting rid of the duplication > from OpenIntoRel (formerly from execMain.c) in regard to DefineRelation()? That's probably reasonable to do, since as you say it would remove the opportunity for bugs-of-omission in the CTAS table creation step. OTOH, if you find yourself having to make any significant changes to DefineRelation, then maybe not. > Secondly, I am currently wondering whether it would be a good idea to use the > ModifyTable infrastructure for doing the insertion instead an own DestReceiver > infrastructure thats only used for CTAS. I think this is probably a bad idea; it will complicate matters and buy little. There's not a lot of stuff needed for the actual data insertion step, since we know the table can't have any defaults, constraints, triggers, etc as yet. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: