Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2349.943024064@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dump bug (jose soares <jose@sferacarta.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
jose soares <jose@sferacarta.com> writes: > I think I found a bug in pg_dump: It's not pg_dump's fault; it's just putting out what's in the system tables, and "date( 'current'::datetime + '0 sec')" is how the 6.5.* parser translates DEFAULT CURRENT_DATE. (Which is inconsistent with how it translates CURRENT_DATE in other contexts, but nevermind.) The failure actually comes up because the 6.5.* parser can't cope with "x::y"-style typecasts in default expressions; it translates them to a syntactically invalid string. CAST ... AS doesn't work either, BTW. I have ripped out and rewritten all of that cruft for 7.0, which is why it works now (more or less). I dunno if it's worth trying to patch around this particular bug in the default-handling code in 6.5.*. It's got so many others :-( Current sources still have a problem with this example, which is that the default expression gets prematurely constant-folded:CREATE TABLE ut (d1 DATE DEFAULT CURRENT_DATE); pg_dumps asCREATE TABLE "ut" ( "d1" date DEFAULT '11-19-1999'::date); Drat. I thought I'd taken care of that class of problems... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: