Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread)
| От | Quartz |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 234805.83988.qm@web33206.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread) ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
int[] ia = batchUpdateException.getUpdateCount() --- On Thu, 3/31/11, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > From: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> > Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread) > To: "Quartz" <quartz12h@yahoo.com> > Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org > Received: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 11:03 AM > Quartz <quartz12h@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > If I issue statement 1, 2 and 3, and statement 2 > fails, there is > > no prescribed behavior for statement 3, but one sure > thing is the > > statement 1 must be completed. > > I don't see how executeBatch can both throw the documented > exception > (BatchUpdateException) and return the int[] which would > tell you > what completed. It doesn't seem to me to make sense > to complete > some unknown mystery subset of the statements, so the only > sane > behavior is to apply none if the documented exception is > thrown. > > -Kevin >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: