Re: do {} while (0) nitpick
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23470.1588793080@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: do {} while (0) nitpick
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I tried this out with ppport.h from perl 5.30.2 which is what's on my > Fedora 31 workstation. It compiled fine, no warnings and the tests all > ran fine. > So we could update it. I'm just not sure there would be any great > benefit from doing so until we want to use some piece of perl API that > postdates 5.11.2, which is where our current file comes from. Yeah, perhaps not. Given our general desire not to break old toolchains, it might be a long time before we want to require any new Perl APIs. > I couldn't actually find an instance of the offending pattern in either > version of pport.h. What am I overlooking? My script was looking for any macro ending with ';', so it found these: #define START_MY_CXT static my_cxt_t my_cxt; # define XCPT_TRY_END JMPENV_POP; # define XCPT_TRY_END Copy(oldTOP, top_env, 1, Sigjmp_buf); Those don't seem like things we'd use directly, so it's mostly moot. BTW, I looked around and could not find a package-provided ppport.h at all on my Red Hat systems. What package is it in? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: