Re: splitting *_desc routines
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: splitting *_desc routines |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23468.1354034078@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: splitting *_desc routines (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: splitting *_desc routines
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi�:
>> FWIW, I'd vote for dumping all of these into *one* rmgrdesc directory
>> (which may as well be under access/ since that's where the xlog code is),
>> regardless of where the corresponding replay code is in the source tree.
>> I don't think splitting them up into half a dozen directories adds
>> anything except confusion. If you want, the header comment for each
>> file could mention where the corresponding replay code lives.
> Done that way.
Looks pretty sane to me. The only thing that seems worth discussing is
whether to put the smgr-related XLOG record declarations in storage.h
as you have here, or to invent a new, more private header for them.
There are XLOG record declarations cluttering a lot of other fairly
public headers; but given that we've invented files like heapam_xlog.h
of late, maybe we should start trying to push those declarations to
less-visible spots. Or maybe it's not worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: