Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23467.1139956134@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Re: Patch Submission Guidelines Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > How much time would you need? I think having every patch built before > anyone even looks at the code would sort out most of the issues I > mentioned. If I ran a buildfarm machine, I'd turn it off immediately if anyone proposed setting up a system that would cause it to run code no one had vetted... so I don't think the above will fly. It might or might not be worth doing something with patches that have passed some kind of initial review but aren't yet applied. IMHO the thing we are really seriously short of is patch reviewers. Neil and Bruce and I seem to be the only ones doing that much at all, and the main burden is falling on Bruce. More eyeballs would help much more than throwing machines at the problem. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: